Articles on criminal law, civil litigation, family & corporate law from a Kota-based advocate.
A pro se maintenance technician alleging sexual harassment and retaliation by Sherwin-Williams filed a prolific docket of motions, with the court noting potential AI-assisted research errors. Several Title VII claims were dismissed while others survive pending amendment, illustrating how AI use by u
SDNY Magistrate Judge Gorenstein fined attorney Tricia Lindsay $2,500 under Rule 11 after her opposition briefs cited numerous fabricated cases; Lindsay offered no coherent explanation for the source of the fake citations and failed to confirm they had been manually verified.
Texas’s Fifth District Court of Appeals affirmed a foreclosure judgment and separately identified that a citation in the appellants’ reply brief appeared to be a hallucinated case from this court that could not be located after extensive research.
Shaun Fleck, founder of an AI company called MarketPulse AI, sued a Delaware credit union over an auto loan dispute using RICO, FCRA, and constitutional claims; the Oregon federal court dismissed most claims but allowed the FCRA claim to proceed.
An Assistant U.S. Attorney was ordered to appear before a federal court in North Carolina after fabricated quotations and misrepresented case holdings were found across five government filings — including fabricated regulatory text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Supervisors and the Civil Divi
Parents suing a school district over the sexual exploitation of their disabled child found their lawyers undermined by AI-hallucinated case citations. The court flagged multiple phantom authorities in the plaintiffs’ brief while largely allowing their substantive claims — Title IX, ADA, and First Am
A pro se plaintiff in New York fabricated statutory language and invented quotes from real US Supreme Court cases in insurance filings, leading to a filing injunction under Rule 11 and the court’s inherent authority, with dismissal of all claims.
A Texas federal court issued a landmark AI disclosure order after a pro se plaintiff admitted that inaccuracies in a joint discovery report resulted from unchecked AI use, requiring all filers to certify AI usage and verify every AI-generated assertion.
Endure Industries, a small business appealing a Defence Health Agency contract cancellation before the ASBCA, cited a nonexistent court decision in its brief. After a show cause order, the company admitted AI use — the first documented AI hallucination admission before the Armed Services Board of Co
A pro se plaintiff admitted using AI to draft filings in an insurance dispute but repeatedly misrepresented the law, citing phantom cases and cases that stood for unrelated propositions. The court denied sanctions against defense counsel while warning that all litigants must verify AI-generated lega