Articles on criminal law, civil litigation, family & corporate law from a Kota-based advocate.
Texas’s Seventh Court of Appeals upheld $14,271.25 in attorney’s fees against a pro se plaintiff whose AI-generated brief cited non-existent cases and contained fabricated quotations from real cases, with the trial court having already warned her that AI use does not excuse misrepresentations.
A Pennsylvania Superior Court suspected AI drafting after finding a stepmother’s custody appeal brief cited cases that did not support claimed propositions. The court warned that AI-hallucinated citations risk waiving the arguments they purport to support under Pennsylvania appellate rules.
A Massachusetts Superior Court denied a Morgan & Morgan attorney’s pro hac vice application based on his prior Wyoming AI sanction — where Morgan & Morgan’s in-house ‘MX2.law’ AI platform generated 8 hallucinated case citations that the attorney signed without reading. AI sanctions now travel across
The BC Civil Resolution Tribunal found a self-represented strata owner’s submissions cited non-existent CRT cases, incorrect citations, and a Strata Property Act subsection that does not exist — identifying these as ‘likely hallucinations generated by artificial intelligence.’
The Sixth Circuit removed a CJA-appointed attorney from a criminal appeal after discovering his briefs — drafted using Westlaw’s CoCounsel AI — contained three fabricated quotations attributed to real cases. The attorney is denied CJA compensation, referred for bar discipline, and replaced. A landma
Former Fox News host Andrea Tantaros, suing pro se, cited non-existent statutory language from the VGMVPL and multiple non-existent cases in her Fox News employment litigation. SDNY inferred AI tool use, struck her unauthorized sur-reply, and warned that future AI citation violations may result in s
Pro se attorney Harry Thomasson filed an opposition brief containing fictitious AI-generated case citations in a New York federal case, then blamed a computer virus for the hallucinations. Judge Wicks rejected the defence, imposed a $1,500 sanction, and declined a bar referral — setting clear parame
Ohio’s 11th Appellate District sanctioned criminal defense attorney William Norman after he filed an application to reopen a murder conviction citing prosecutor quotes that never appeared in the trial record. Admitting under oath, Norman attributed the fabrications to AI use, receiving a public repr
Ohio’s Eleventh District Court of Appeals sanctioned Attorney William Norman with a $2,000 fine, disciplinary referral, and a two-year court-notification requirement after his paralegal used ChatGPT to fabricate prosecutor quotes in a murder appeal, exposing a systemic failure in AI oversight.
Alabama federal judge publicly reprimanded attorney Edward May for submitting two fabricated quotations generated by ChatGPT and OpenCase AI. May admitted using AI in a multi-step drafting process, arriving late to his own show-cause hearing, and filing a typographically sloppy response — all of whi