How courts and legislatures are treating Artificial Intelligence — case tracker, analysis, and India angle.
A North Carolina federal court dismissed a pro se plaintiff’s FCRA case and denied leave to amend after her AI-generated briefs cited fictitious provisions of the North Carolina Identity Theft Protection Act and contained fabricated case citations — even after the court had already warned her it wou
Maine federal judge imposed non-monetary sanctions on attorney Kelly Guagenty after she used Claude or ChatGPT to generate case citations that were fabricated, then filed a Notice of Errata that introduced additional inaccuracies. The sanction focused on education: attending AI CLE, creating firm AI
In a Florida family law certiorari petition filed by a pro se litigant, the appellate court found that only 4 of 13 cited cases both existed and stood for the propositions asserted. Five cases were entirely fabricated; four real cases were cited for propositions they do not support. The court issued
Chief Judge Kendall sanctioned a pro se plaintiff $5,000 after finding 30+ AI hallucinations across two filings — including 13 in a single Rule 59(e) motion and a fabrication of language attributed to the court’s own prior order that the judge never wrote. The court’s grace had been exhausted.
The Sixth Circuit removed a CJA-appointed attorney from a criminal appeal after discovering his briefs — drafted using Westlaw’s CoCounsel AI — contained three fabricated quotations attributed to real cases. The attorney is denied CJA compensation, referred for bar discipline, and replaced. A landma
A USA court addressed the use of AI tool in legal proceedings in Ave Capital Group Llc v. Strum, examining whether AI-generated content in court submissions met professional standards. The decision adds to the growing body of case law holding lawyers accountable for unverified AI-generated citations and arguments.
A USA court addressed the use of AI tool in legal proceedings in In Re Carreon v. Rosas, examining whether AI-generated content in court submissions met professional standards. The decision adds to the growing body of case law holding lawyers accountable for unverified AI-generated citations and arguments.
A USA court addressed the use of AI tool in legal proceedings in Mutugu v. Kiaraho, examining whether AI-generated content in court submissions met professional standards. The decision adds to the growing body of case law holding lawyers accountable for unverified AI-generated citations and arguments.
A USA court addressed the use of AI tool in legal proceedings in Tqj Llc v. Jennifer, examining whether AI-generated content in court submissions met professional standards. The decision adds to the growing body of case law holding lawyers accountable for unverified AI-generated citations and arguments.
A federal court in Michigan denied a motion for relief from judgment in a case where Westlaw editors flagged the filed submissions as containing non-existent citations generated by ChatGPT and OpenAI tools. The case is another data point in the escalating judicial reckoning with generative AI in legal practice.